Sign In
New User? Register
MORM · Malankara Orthodox Renaissance Movement
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: The visit of HH Zakka I to Malankara   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1577 of 1888 |
Re: The visit of HH Zakka I to Malankara

 
Refering to Mr.Manoj's posting,
 I am glad that atleast one person on the Patriarchs side respects Court decisions,although their leaders have very littile respect to the courts.But to put things in perspective,the Division Bench didnot go into the merrits of the case since the visit in question has almost concluded by the time the case came before the Bench.The order also states that infingement of law,if any,can be brought before the appropriate forums and releief sought.
        Of course ,the Orthodox prelates also visit their follwers abroad,but do not try to enter Churches where they are not entitled  to legally enter.They also donot ignore the visa rules.That is the differance between lawful visits and unlawful visits.
        With regard to the point on slight shivering of hands,I am surprised that Mr. Manoj is unable to understand what is stated in simple English!!!!
 
THOMAS CHANDY



Mon Nov 3, 2008 3:00 am

thomasattuth...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1577 of 1888 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

    There appears to be some incorrect understanding regarding the visit of HH Zakka I to Malankara and the reaction of MOC to the same. 1.If the prelate is...
Thomas Chandy
thomasattuth...
Offline Send Email
Oct 23, 2008
4:58 am

Dear Thomas sir, Most of these churches where HH is visiting have accpeted the 2002 constitution and are a part of the Jacobite syrian christian church who ...
manojcgeorge
Offline Send Email
Oct 24, 2008
5:14 am

MORM DIGEST NO 758,Posting of Mr.Manoj  The issue is not as simple as it is being made out.Entry of HH to any one of the 1088 Churches which the Supreme Court...
Thomas Chandy
thomasattuth...
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2008
1:05 pm

Dear Thomas sir, Then why didnt the court prohibit him ? You had already filed a case against this. When the judge rejected this case he also took a few ...
manojcgeorge
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2008
10:57 am

  Refering to Mr.Manoj's posting,  I am glad that atleast one person on the Patriarchs side respects Court decisions,although their leaders have very littile...
Thomas Chandy
thomasattuth...
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2008
1:43 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help