Sign In
New User? Register
SherlockHolmesSocietyofIndia · Sherlockians- The Game is afoot
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Interesting discussion line   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2264 of 2868 |
Hello All Fellow Sherlockians,

The mention of phrenology is very interesting, and as I recall there
are several mentions of head or skull dimensions and relation to
intelligence. But I feel that clearly... Holmes as a brilliant
observer would no doubt have made the correlation that, there are
many small people with tiny heads who are extremely
intelligent ....and conversly there are many big people with large
heads who happen to be quite stupid........such is the real life
test and experience Holmes would have seen time and time again. The
placement of the various lumps, ridges and other surface deviations
may or may not be significant. So I have a difficult time believing
Holmes would have paid any serious credence to this science at the
time. As an apocryphal tale....the inclusion of phrenology in a
Holmes monograph would be quite interesting to read. However...in
that time period there was in vogue...the correlation of appearence
in determining possible or probable guilt. "shifty eyes" "evil
grin" etc etc....... some of this is taken seriously at the time
and I think there was a latin phrase that kind of sums it all up,
monstrum en fronte......monstrum en animo

As for ACD, I have read some observations on his scientific views,
and it seems his belief in dematerialization, fairies and even
palmistry ...only echo quite truely..........how far we have come in
the last hundred years....he was cutting edge at his
zenith.......and who is to say that some things we do now, will not
bear the scrutiny of future generations ....irrespective of initial
intentions no matter how good or innocent or even....scientific...


I also want to say this direction of discussion and contributions
from others is refreshing and it heartens me to see additional views
and deductions from our esteemed members.

As for the motorcycle he may have (probably) ridden .......after
some research and opinions from others, I believe it is most likely
he rode a Royal Enfield (with a Minerva engine) to begin and later
may have switched to either BSA or Matchless. (I tried to find what
motorcycle was most used by the Brits in WW1,no luck) Though I would
secretly have liked to find a way he would have been given a Harley
Davidson or Indian model by a client as payment for some small
service.

So does anyone else feel the Royal Enfield Motorcycle would have
been the most likely vehicle to occupy the parking spot in front of
221 Baker St......watched over by a few odd Baker Street
Irregulars????


I remain,

an SHSI member in good standing (until told otherwise) number unknown
(did anyone ever keep track of what our SHSI number is when we
joined?)

James27Word






Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:50 am

james27word
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #2264 of 2868 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello All Fellow Sherlockians, The mention of phrenology is very interesting, and as I recall there are several mentions of head or skull dimensions and...
james27word
Offline Send Email
Apr 20, 2007
2:50 am

Re motorcycles, I saw a reference to the motorcycle ridden by T. E. Lawrence when he was killed on one. Here it is: 'In the last 12 years of his life, Lawrence...
Tim Symonds
tim.symonds@...
Send Email
Apr 20, 2007
12:07 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help