Sign In
New User? Register
feflow · FEFLOW Users Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
R: [feflow] to reduce model run time   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #199 of 223 |
Hi,

There are problems of stability.
You should check the model before running it.

I suggest a couple of checks:

 at first run the model in steady state and check if it converges and that the
balance (IN-OUT) is fine for your problem, otherwise you have to control your
input, the number of layers vs deep, mesh etc
then I would rehash the steady state solution and I would run the new model in
transient conditionif that does not work, I would check again the mesh near well
points and verify how the model works without wells.Hoping this will help you!

Don't quit!

Giovanna Monti
environmental engineer
Washington DC


--- Mer 13/5/09, manish_cjonty2006 <manish_cjonty2006@...> ha scritto:

Da: manish_cjonty2006 <manish_cjonty2006@...>
Oggetto: [feflow] to reduce model run time
A: feflow@...
Data: Mercoledì 13 maggio 2009, 12:42


Hello everyone...

I am doing groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling for saturated
region with transient conditions. I am doing it for 1.0xE4 years. while doing
that i am facing two problems

1.Head values at some of the observation wells are oscillating 10-15 metres

2.Time step is not going beyond 200 days so it is taking so much time for
running. I am using automatic predictor corrector method.

i would like you all to give your suggestions so that i can resolve thee
problems.

Thanks.

Regards,
Manish Chopra



Thu May 14, 2009 8:29 pm

giovanna.monti
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #199 of 223 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi, There are problems of stability. You should check the model before running it. I suggest a couple of checks:  at first run the model in steady state and...
Giovanna Monti
giovanna.monti
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
3:15 am

Gio's advice is good. The problem may lie with conflicting boundary conditions or bc constraints, which may or may not show up in the steady state. Another...
Pete Sinton
denpos42
Offline Send Email
May 24, 2009
5:21 am

With FEFLOW, I experienced stability problems with models with - an irregular mesh --> try the Smooth mesh tool; - too high conductivity differences (elements...
piercoop
Offline Send Email
May 24, 2009
5:21 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help