Sign In
New User? Register
gms-users · GMS Users Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
modeling faults   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #50 of 73 |
Re: modeling faults

Check out Caine and Forster 1999, caine et al 1996, smith et al 1990.
Barrier versus conduit determination are dependant on the rock type,
fault orientation, structural regiem, and infilling.

I use FEMWATER to buld gw models with faults having irregular
geometries. Packer test data from boreholes drilled into faults are
used to bound the fault K values and sens analysis.


--- In gms-users@..., Tim Hazlett <hydromodeler@...>
wrote:
>
> There's a seminal paper on fault flow in the Bighorn Basin (USA) by
Bredehoeft from the 1980's.
>
> He used MODFLOW if I recall.
>
> The real decision you need to make here is whether they are acting as
barriers against or conduits for flow.
>
> I suggest a sensitivity analyses as well.
>
> Regards
> Tim
>





Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 pm

jtdunnman
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #50 of 73 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

There's a seminal paper on fault flow in the Bighorn Basin (USA) by Bredehoeft from the 1980's. He used MODFLOW if I recall. The real decision you need to make...
Tim Hazlett
hydromodeler
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2008
2:30 am

Check out Caine and Forster 1999, caine et al 1996, smith et al 1990. Barrier versus conduit determination are dependant on the rock type, fault orientation,...
jtdunnman
Offline Send Email
May 17, 2008
12:59 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help