Sign In
New User? Register
hydrologymodel · Hydrological Modelling
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Help needed:GIS maps reg.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #375 of 727 |
Re: Help needed:GIS maps reg.

Hello Tejaswi

The problem is that the method that you are using doesn't fit for
chemical parameters, because those values could be from decimals to
thousands. I Strongly recommend you to use Krigging method, BUT using
the appropiete variogram. The best software could be SURFER or an
Arcview extention for krigging (you can find out in the internet).

Regards

Xavier COELLO-RUBIO
UNESCO-IHE
The Netherlands


--- In hydrologymodel@..., Maribeth Milner
<mmilner1@u...> wrote:
>
> Tejaswi,
>
> There are many algorithms for interpolating data. Some
are "exact" (in
> that they return the value of the input data) and some
are "inexact".
>
> The Surfer (http://www.goldensoftware.com/) documentation
provides this
> list of exact and inexact interpolators...
>
> Exact:
> Inverse Distance to a Power (no smoothing function)
> Kriging (no specified nugget effect)
> Nearest Neighbor
> Radial Basis Function (no R2 specified)
> Modified Shepard's Method (no smoothing factor)
> Triangulation with Linear Interpolation (TIN)
> Natural Neighbor
>
> Inexact:
> Inverse Distance to a Power (with smoothing factor)
> Kriging (with error nugget)
> Polynomial Regression
> Radial Basis Function (with R2 specified)
> Modified Shepard's Method
>
> Note... the ability to return input values may or may not be
related to
> surface accuracy. To test accuracy, hold out (don't use) a few
well
> positioned data points and compare those values with their
predicted
> values. All interpolators have problems at the edges of data sets,
so be
> sure to collect extra data (outside of your study area) to avoid
this problem.
>
> Also, interpolators generally describe local variability or global
> variability - not both. The exceptions are geostatistics and
radial basis
> functions.
>
> Surfer has been a favorite interpolator package, but ESRI's
Geostatistical
> Analyst extension (in ArcGIS) is also very good. Besides having
both
> radial basis functions and geostatistical functions - it provides
surface
> error analysis tools that produce both graphic and numeric
descriptors.
>
> ESRI has a free online course that covers this extension
> (http://campus.esri.com/campus/catalog/index.cfm?
CFID=17792502&CFTOKEN=22787
> 414 "Introduction to ArcGIS 9 (or 8) Geostatistical Analyst") that
will
> get you started. Looks like this month's free online seminar
(offered 3
> times on Jan 26th) will also cover this extension
(http://campus.esri.com/).
>
> Good luck,
>
> Maribeth
>
> At 04:15 PM 1/10/2006 +0000, you wrote:
>
> >Hello members,
> > I am using ArcView 3.2a (demo version) to generate contour
maps for
> > different physico chemical parameters of groundwater samples. The
> > contours are being generated by making use of the point
interpolation
> > method. While generating these maps from the database created, i
am
> > encountering this problem. The problem is, many of the contours
are
> > displaying negative values. There are no negative values in the
database
> > and moreover no field in the database is left blank. The minimum
value
> > for any of the parametes is zero. Eventhough for some of the
parameters
> > there are not even zero values, the negative contour values are
being
> > displayed.
> > Any one knowing the solution for this problem is kindly
requested
> > to help me in this regard.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Tejaswi
>











Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:08 pm

xcoellor
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #375 of 727 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello members, I am using ArcView 3.2a (demo version) to generate contour maps for different physico chemical parameters of groundwater samples. The contours...
Tejaswi
tejaswi_sh
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2006
5:33 am

Dear Tejaswi: Contouring is a "trend" analysis. While we accept interpolation using known random points, we do not trust extrapolation, that is program...
karanjac
Offline Send Email
Jan 12, 2006
12:45 pm

Hello Tejaswi The problem is that the method that you are using doesn't fit for chemical parameters, because those values could be from decimals to thousands....
Xavier Coello
xcoellor
Offline Send Email
Jan 12, 2006
12:46 pm

Tejaswi, There are many algorithms for interpolating data. Some are "exact" (in that they return the value of the input data) and some are "inexact". The...
Maribeth Milner
mmilner1@...
Send Email
Jan 12, 2006
12:47 pm

Hello Tejaswi The problem is that the method that you are using doesn't fit for chemical parameters, because those values could be from decimals to thousands....
Xavier Coello-Rubio
xcoellor
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2006
10:29 am

Speaking of SURFER and GIS, check out SurfLink at http://www.certaintech.com/surflink.asp which leverage the best of both technologies. - David Ward ...
David S. Ward
davewsward
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2006
5:38 am

Hiii, If you have 3D Analysis extension for ArcView3.2a, you can do it. Otherwise you should find a free GIS software like GRASS, SAGA GIS, etc… First you...
hunukumbura
hunukubura
Offline Send Email
Jan 12, 2006
12:48 pm

Dear Tejaswi I think you have to re-check your database and it is better to use SURFER for contouring. the gridding method depend on your data distribution, if...
Saleh Sefry
sefry2000@...
Send Email
Jan 15, 2006
5:31 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help