Yahoo! Groups Tips
Did you know...
You can search the group for older
messages.
|
Dear jatropha group members
my name's Felix Padel. I'm British by birth but Indian
by marriage, and work as an
anthropologist/writer/activist supporting the cause of
tribal people threatened with displacement.
In mid-May I went to a major Climate Change Conference
in London. There I learnt more about the biofuel
situation worldwide, which is extremely alarming.
Afterwards I joined an internationally focused yahoo
group on the subject, and forward one of their digests
below, in case anyone is interested in joining that
group. If no-one objects I'll forward occasional
digests like this. I find it's very hard that in India
there's not much info or link-up with activists in
other 3rd world countries.
So I now have been asked & wish to know myself if the
situation is getting as bad and dangerous in India
too? I'd heard that in Chattisgarh many thousands
hectares of jatropha have been planted, and that this
includes some of the 700 or so villages that have been
burnt & evacuated by the Salwa Judum in the terrible
civil war in south Chattisgarh. Can anyone in the
group confirm this?
On the international situation, to cut a long story
short, the IPCC has recommended more use of biofuels
and the EU Govt's target's to increase from 1% to 10%,
the US from 4% to 20%. To service this demand millions
of hectares of plantations are being made causing mass
deforestation + unreported human rights abuses on
displaced farmers in Many Countries, including
especially:
Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay.....
Indonesia, Malaysia, Phillipines.....
Nigeria & other African countries.
Already new ports & factories are being built in
Singapore etc specially for biofuels, so there may be
only a small window of time to stop this industry
investing in unstoppable programmes. Also there's alot
of investment in "2nd generation biofuels" which are a
also new generation of highly complex GM creations,
that are likely to be very dangerous ("floppy trees"
with weak bark fibres, easier to process, that cd
easily spread into & infect other plants....).
I don't know how bad jatropha is relative to other
biofuels, like soya, rape (mustard) etc.
Anyway please let me know any responses.
All best wishes
Felix Padel
________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
|
Felix Padel <felixorisa@...>
felixorisa
Offline Send Email
|
Very interesting. Please post it to Jatropha group. regards pankaj
Felix Padel <felixorisa@...> wrote: Much in here of interest wfd it be of interest to people in the Indian group?
Felix
____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXICDate: 31 May 2007 11:56:15 -0000 From: biofuelwatch@yahoogroups.com To: biofuelwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [biofuelwatch] Digest Number 345
Messages In This Digest (5 Messages) Messages - 1.
-
Posted by: "Elizabeth Bravo" ebravo@... Thu May 31, 2007 1:17 am (PST) OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT CORREA ON THE AGROFORESTRY PLAN
The indigenous people, peasant and afrodescendent organizations which met in Quito- Ecuador on 24th May 2007, to analyse the Agronomic and Forestry Plan of the Government of Rafael Correa, express:
We know that it is a priority of your government to work for the benefit of the populations that traditionally
they have been excluded, like we are the native people, afro- descendents and peasants of this country, and we have put our hope in you, because until now, the State has traditionally benefited only to the large landlords, to the big producers, to the agrobusiness sector, in detriment of the rural economy.
However, we have seen that the program of the present Minister of Agriculture continues in the same line, "the country is still in the hands of few". The Plan do privileges the agrobusiness sector, promotes the monocultures and intends to deepen a technological package that causes damages to the natural resources, to the soil, al water, to the biodiversity and deepens the rural inequalities and the processes of impoverishment of the peasantry. The production of monocultures is promoted for agrofuels without taking into account the demands of food sovereignty and defence of the collective rights of the Indigenous peoples and afro
descendent communities.
Furthermore, the Plan promotes an anti ecological reforestation based on monocultures, without prior studies on the impact that the plan will have on the rural life. The Plan focus, as the only strategy, on a type of forest plantations directed to the big industry and the external market.
The peasant, rural, afrodescendents and indigenous people organizations of Ecuador who attended the above mentioned meeting, demand President Rafael Correa to ask the Minister of Agriculture to act in accordance with your proposal of refund the country in benefit of the poorest population.
Our demands are:
1. An Integral Agrarian Reform that eliminate the land concentration and guaranties access to the productive resources with justice, to the small farmers 2. The protection and promotion of the national food and agriculture production, with sustainable productive programs in the hands of the
rural communities 3. The defence of biodiversity, genetic resources, traditional knowledge, in contrast with the promotion of forest and agricultural monocultures specially for agrofuels and other cash products, the introduction of GM seeds and the technological packages. 4. The development of rural policies that respect the diversity of the indigenous peoples, the peasants and rural communities that promotes interculturality; and that recognises the contribution of women in the sovereign productive processes 5. To work in a participatory agrarian and forestry policy, with the inclusion of indigenous peoples, the peasants and rural communities, afrodescendent and rural women, using a methodology that respect our traditional practices and that ensure the local control of our resources 6. Prioritise local and national food sovereignty, in which the land and the water are used to satisfy the food needs of the population, an not
any extractive activity (mining, oil and timber). The water have to be used for the human consumption and not for hydroelectric dams. 7. The resources of the State should be use to meet the previous demands and not for the promotion of agrobusiness, and agrofuels, We reject any mechanisms that promotes the land market.
- 2.
-
Thu May 31, 2007 2:05 am (PST) [A ZNet Commentary - have a look and consider supporting ZNet at http://www.zmag.org] Biofuels: a danger for Latin America May 26, 2007 By Marie Trigona Renewable fuels, in particular Biofuels, energy sources derived from agricultural crops have suddenly won the support from the United States. This is partly due to George Bush's recent 5-nation tour of Latin America to wedge out unity and push through ethanol accords. Development funds and corporations hope that Latin America, especially refining sugarcane into fuel in Brazil and soybeans in Argentina, can spur the US's booming biofuel industry demands. Corporate experts and financiers held
the First Biofuels Congress of the Americas in Buenos Aires this month to promote biofuel production in the region. Former US Vice President Al Gore addressed investors, NGO's and soy producers at the congress to spearhead renewable fuel production in Argentina. Northern hunger for "bio" fuels Inexpensive land, cheap labor and plentiful bumper crops of soybeans make Argentina a prime target for the production of ethanol and bio diesel. Argentina is already offering tax-incentives to step up investments for the biofuels market which is expected to triple by 2015. The South American nation wants 5 percent of its fuel supply be biodiesel or ethanol-based in three years. The government has eagerly pushed through pro-biofuel policy but has ignored worries over food supply, the environmental effects of mono-agricultural production and the social side-effects of biofuel production on the rural population.
Argentina's vice-president Daniel Scioli welcomed international financiers to the Biofuels Congress, saying that Argentina is eager to develop biodiesel technology and production. "Argentina is already exporting biodiesel. We are hopeful and are creating favorable conditions to lure investments to this sector. We are developing the necessary infrastructure, improving our highways and ports to transport and store the fruit of our applied intelligence. "
"We are completely convinced that alternative biofuels will convert Argentina into a global leader in renewable energy," said Scioli at the Biofuels Congress. Investors and institutions attending the First Biofuels Congress of the Americas paid 500 dollars a head to attend the event, which was closed off to media outlets not allied to biofuels.
A study published by the National Academy of Sciences found that neither ethanol, which is corn derived, nor
bio-diesel, which is soy- produced can replace petroleum without having an impact on food supply. However, biofuel proponents brushed off any criticism of the renewable energy industry during the First Biofuels Congress of the Americas.
Juan Carlos Iturregui president of the Foundation for InterAmerican Development said that biofuels can only bring positive results. "Biofuels can propel development. They bring a very important factor which is the ability to compete and develop. This has already been proven, let's not get tied up with supposed theories and false debates. There can be food for everyone. There can be biofuels for everyone."
Soybean plantations bump off small farms
Argentina is the third-largest soybean producer in the world after the United States and Brazil. Top soil erosion and pollution caused from pesticides and fertilizers have been just some of the side effects to soybean
plantations which have expanded exponentially at a rate of 10 percent annually.
Many foreign financiers have been eager to invest in the booming biodiesal industry. Dynamotive, a Canadian biofuels developer, will invest up to 120 million in six plants in Argentina that would use lumber- and paper-industry waste to make biofuel. The Spanish- Argentine oil and gas company Repsol YPF has already invested 30 million in dollars in a biofuel refinery in the province of Buenos Aires, expected to produce 100,000 tons a year as of 2007.
According to Oscar Delgado, a farmer from the northern province of Salta, soy production has also led to the violent eviction of small farmers and indigenous from lands cleared for soy bean plantations. "In the northern region of Argentina, in the provinces of Jujuy and Salta, local residents are witnessing a crisis because of the expansion of the mono-crops. Most serious is the expansion
of trans genetic soy in Salta that has produced the eviction of small farmers and indigenous from lands. The local government in Salta supports these evictions; the government is supporting these new businessmen coming to the province."
Shortly after Al Gore's visit to Buenos Aires, seven small-scale farmers were arrested for resisting eviction from lands in the Northern province of Santiago del Estero. The farmers form part of MOCASE, a provincial grassroots movement of campesinos that promotes sustainable agriculture to build community. Their land will be cleared for soy production. The Santiago del Estero provincial government, which ordered the arrests, co-sponsored the First Biofuels Congress of the Americas, which paid Gore 170,000 dollars to give a 40 minute presentation derived from his award-winning film The Inconvenient Truth.
Goodbye food sovereignty Local environmental groups and farmers held
a parallel event to shed light on the dangers of biofuels, especially the effects on food production and prices. They also held a protest outside of the hotel where the Biofuels Congress of the Americas was held.
With surgery masks and megaphones on hand, they chanted "Food sovereignty, Yes! Biofuels, No!" Soledad Ogoliano, from the assembly for food sovereignty said that multi-nationals like Monsanto and Repsol YPF, a Spanish-Argentine petroleum company, speculate large profits while putting Argentina's food production at risk. "The immediate effect of this kind of production is the massive disforestation like we are seeing now in the forests in Chaco, the Amazon, and other areas that are large sources of biodiversity that are destroyed for mono crops, only one agricultural crop, generally transgenetic like soy." She added "We are talking about production that is highly concentrated because it requires large
amounts of capital and investments in technology. It is no longer agricultural food production in the hands of local communities, but simply large scale production of commodities."
Food prices have already been affected due to soy and corn production for export. Economists worry that plant-based fuels will cause food prices to soar in Argentina, where food inflation continues to rise over 15% annually. The nation has unsuccessfully imposed export limits on certain foods like milk and beef, where production is plentiful but supply for the domestic market scarce and expensive for consumers.
A drive in food prices will hit the nation hard, with over 30 percent of the population under the poverty line. The policies promoting biofuel exports over domestic food production in developing countries could be an ecological and social recipe for disaster. In addition to Argentina, small farmers in Brazil and
Paraguay have been pushed off of lands cleared for soy production at an exponential rate. In Mexico, consumers are fighting a tortilla war, a battle over increased prices in tortillas partly due to the nation's increase in ethanol production.
Groups will have to fight an uphill battle against corporations that have a tight hold on growing biofuel production in Latin America promising quench the North's thirst for energy at the cost of food sovereignty and biodiversity. Local environmental groups in Argentina will organize a series of protests against the corporations investing in biofuel in the coming months. Subsequent bio-fuel congresses will take place in Mexico, Colombia and Brazil this year.
Marie Trigona is a writer and independent radio producer based in Buenos Aires. She can be reached at mtrigona@msn.com
- 3.
-
Thu May 31, 2007 2:12 am (PST) http://environment.guardian.co.uk/conservation/story/0,,2091822,00.htmlWorld's great apes face disaster, says Leakey Hunting, disease, logging and demand for biofuels cited among prime threats David Adam, environment correspondent Thursday May 31, 2007 The Guardian < http://www.guardian.co.uk> Gorilla A female mountain gorilla in Uganda. Photograph: Stuart Price/AFP/Getty One of the world's most prominent conservation experts yesterday issued a rallying cry to save the great apes, man's closest biological cousins, which are under serious threat of extinction. Richard Leakey, former head of the Kenya wildlife service and now chair of Wildlife Direct, said apes across the world faced unprecedented threats from the combined effects of hunting, disease
and logging. And he said efforts to tackle global warming through the use of biofuels could cause more damage to ape populations because of pressure to chop down their tropical forest homes. About 80% of orang-utan habitat in south-east Asia has been destroyed in the past 20 years because of soaring demand for land to produce palm oil for western markets. Experts warn that increased uptake of alternative fuels could mean the disappearance of the remaining 50,000 animals there within a generation. Dr Leakey, who will outline his concerns in a public lecture tonight at the Royal Geographical Society in London, said human activity was directly to blame for the deaths of millions of gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos across the world. He urged politicians working on a new international treaty to regulate greenhouse gas emissions to focus more on incentives to conserve forests across south-east Asia, Africa and central and south
America. Dr Leakey said: "People shrug their shoulders and say what are poor countries to do if they can't export their natural resources, and I understand this, but it is simply not sustainable the way it is going. The threat to great ape populations around the world is growing visibly." He said preventing deforestation would help curb global warming as well as preserving endangered apes. Carbon released by deforestation is reckoned to account for 25% of all human greenhouse gas emissions, second only to the energy generation sector. Scientists say conserving forests offers one of the cheapest ways to tackle climate change, and steps to reward tropical countries which leave their forests untouched will be discussed at the G8 summit in Germany next week. Dr Leakey, a patron of a United Nations Environment Programme great apes survival project, called for more "imaginative" solutions such as credits for preserving
biodiversity and wildlife habitats which a country could sell to others to offset their carbon pollution. "We find it very hard to preserve natural beauty, but we are happy to spend £80m on a Picasso and a fortune looking after it." But he insisted developing countries must take their share of responsibility for global warming. "Developing countries are shrill about the damage that developed countries have caused with their pollution," he said. "The developing world should have a comparable amount of responsibility because of deforestation. I don't think we [Kenya] can afford to shelter behind the fact that we're a new country and we were grossly exploited before, and so we need to be given a break. We need to look at the effect we're having on the whole planet." He called for a "huge revolution in entrepreneurial skills" to develop technology such as nuclear fusion and hydrogen power as a way of limiting the need for
biofuels. "The whole biofuel issue is of great concern. And it's not just biofuels, the destruction of rainforest to make way for palm oil plantations is extraordinary. "
A UN report this month also raised concerns over a rapid expansion of biofuels, saying they could have an irreversible environmental impact. There are also concerns about their impact on global food prices, with growing competition for scarce land resources.
Dr Leakey said the direct effects of climate change could spell disaster for the great apes. "I don't think we can say enough to stimulate concern over climate change. It's a complex process but it will undoubtedly impact on everything we know and the implications for biodiversity are there for all to see. We don't know the tolerance of plants to the predicted temperature changes. We should not for a minute assume that forests, rivers and lakes are permanent features of our landscape."
He also
criticised what he called the "oxymoron" of ecotourism, which he said was based on "a desperate race to make money while you still can". He said: "An awful lot of damage is done under the umbrella of ecotourism. The tourism industry needs to be talked to very seriously about setting standards that are something other than profit-motivated."
Profile: Richard Leakey
Born in Kenya in 1944 to two esteemed anthropologists, Richard Leakey led expeditions which uncovered a steady stream of human-ancestor fossils during the 1970s which dazzled the scientific world and helped to clarify our evolutionary history. Among the most important finds are the remains of Turkana Boy, a 1.6m-year-old Homo erectus skeleton, recovered virtually intact, as well as the 2.5m-year-old Black Skull, which forced palaeontologists to drastically rethink the structure of the human family tree.
In 1969 he was diagnosed with a terminal kidney
disease and a decade later received a lifesaving transplant from his younger brother.
In the 1980s he devoted more of his time to Kenya's museums and, subsequently, conservation issues. From 1989 to 1994, as head of the Kenya wildlife service, he beefed up the country's national parks and led high-profile and successful campaigns against elephant poaching. In 1993 he lost both legs below the knee when the plane he was piloting malfunctioned and crashed. Rumours of sabotage were never proven.
In the mid-1990s he entered Kenyan politics, first as co-founder of a new opposition party, and then in government at the invitation of former president Daniel arap Moi.
- 4.
-
Thu May 31, 2007 2:18 am (PST) http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/42276/story.htmMexicans Torch Tequila Fields for Ethanol Boom Corn _____ Mail < http://www.planetark.com/mail_dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=42276> this story to a friend | Printer < http://www.planetark.com/avantgo/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=42276> friendly version MEXICO: May 31, 2007 MEXICO CITY - Mexican farmers are setting ablaze fields of blue agave, the cactus-like plant used to make the fiery spirit tequila, and resowing the land with corn as soaring US ethanol demand pushes up prices. The switch to corn will contribute to an expected scarcity of agave in coming
years, with officials predicting that farmers will plant between 25 percent and 35 percent less agave this year to turn the land over to corn. "Those growers are going after what pays best now," said Ismael Vicente Ramirez, head of agriculture at Mexico's Tequila Regulatory Council. The large, spiky-leaved agave thrives on high, arid land and can take eight years to reach maturity. To remove the plants, growers cut them at their stems and often burn the fields to remove the roots. Tequila, drunk in shots and cocktails around the world, is named after a town in the western Mexican state of Jalisco. Production of agave, from the lily family, soared in recent years as farmers cashed in on record prices brought about by a shortage of the plant at the start of the decade. Despite rapid growth in tequila drinking, especially overseas, the over-supply of agave has driven prices for the plant to rock-bottom levels.
Many growers have started to abandon the crop in favor of corn, whose price has rocketed in line with massive growth in US demand for ethanol after President George W. Bush outlined targets last year to use the corn-based fuel as a gasoline alternative. Agave supply is also being hit this year by disease in the fields, partly due to farmers caring less for the plants after prices dropped. "The problem that we are going to see, perhaps by mid-2008, is that a lot of agave is sick," Agriculture Ministry official Arnulfo del Toro said. "That will have to be taken out and production is going to drop a lot." - 5.
-
Thu May 31, 2007 2:55 am (PST) The article below is from the May World Rainforest Movement Bulletin (www.wrm.org. uy) - it is not yet on the WRM website, but should go up shortly.
The Thai government has set its policy on producing palm oil-based biodiesel as energy. At present, the country's large-scale oil
palm harvest areas account to around 400,000 hectares, but since 2006, a discourse on oil palm has emerged to promote its plantation as a `renewable source of energy', a `country savior', a `reforestation scheme', a `wind-protection zone', and a `transformation of deserted rice fields into palm fields'.
To fulfill the government's ambition, a daily production of 8.5 million litres of biodiesel must be met. That means another 800,000 hectares of oil palm plantation areas must be expanded between 2006 and 2009, totaling 1.2 million hectares of the palm cultivation. By 2029, the plantation areas would reach 1.6 million hectares.
All research work has been conducted to seek monoculture techniques to maximize the production of oil palm, but the Thai government has never revealed this crop's environmental impacts.
It is a great concern that the Thai government has never said that the land used for oil palm
plantation often becomes deteriorated because of the monoculture type of production, with extensive use of chemicals. It is difficult to produce oil palm in an integrated manner because of the bulkiness of the palm trees and because its fibrous roots spread far and wide. Over three-ton weight of each tree allows very few types of plant to be grown in the plantation. Making their way into the plantation ground is very difficult for animals living in the ground such as earthworms. Getting rid of the dead trees and their roots is hard and costs a lot of money since it needs to pay a backhoe to uproot or to use chemicals to destroy them.
The government has provided farmers with funding, raw materials and other inputs. Such active promotion has resulted in the rapid expansion of the plantation areas, especially in the watershed forest, wetlands, community public forest and rice fields. If an expansion of the oil palm
plantation areas was made according to the government's plan, Thailand would irreversibly lose its food security, forests and biological diversity. It would mean a catastrophe for the Thai People.
Excerpted and adapted from `Ten Million Rai of Oil Palm Plantation: A Catastrophe for the Thai People', by Ms.Bandita Yangdee, Project for Ecological Awareness Building (EAB), sent by Sayamol Kaiyoorawong, e- mail: noksayamol@yahoo.com The full article is available at: http://www.wrm.org.uy/countries/Thailand/Catastrophe.pdf
Download prohibited? No problem! CHAT from any browser, without download.
|
pankaj oudhia <pankajoudhia@...>
pankajoudhia@...
Send Email
|
|