Sign In
New User? Register
jatropha · Say No To Jatropha
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Biofuel agribusiness profits from Columbia's civil war   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #422 of 892 |
Item 4 here on Columbia. Items 1-3 on the huge &
dangerous boost being given to biofuels in Europe and
US, without comrehension of the effects in developing
countries.
Felix




________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:48 am

felixorisa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Messages In This Digest (4 Messages)

Messages

1.

EU eyes imports to quench biofuels thirst

Posted by: "Andrew Boswell" a_boswell_2004@...   a_boswell_2004

Mon Jul 9, 2007 6:47 am (PST)


http://www.euractiv.com/en/trade/eu-eyes-imports-quench-biofuels-thirst/article-165289
EU eyes imports to quench biofuels thirst[fr][de] Published: Thursday 5 July 2007 | Updated: Friday 6 July 2007
Europe must open its doors to imports of biofuels from developing countries in order to reduce its oil dependency and cut carbon emissions, said EU leaders at a high-level conference in Brussels attended by Brazilian President Luis Inacio 'Lula' da Silva.
Related: LinksDossier: Biofuels for transport
News: Groups unite to halt EU biofuels rush
Analysis: Biofuels: Turning petroleum addicts into alcoholics?

Background: Other related news

EU, Brazil join in strategic partnership
Boeing 'really excited' about biofuels
Commission seeks advice on biofuels amid growing scepticism
Wood, food or biofuels?
Bush's State of the Union: no energy U-turn

As part of Europe’s strategy for reducing oil dependency and fighting climate change, EU leaders committed, at the March 2007 European Council, to a binding minimum target for each member state to achieve at least 10% of their transport fuel consumption from biofuels.
Transport is responsible for around one third of all carbon dioxide emissions in the EU with road vehicles relying almost entirely on oil as a primary energy source.
The EU sees biofuels – considered to be “carbon neutral” – as the only viable green alternative to oil. However, a number of doubts have been raised about the benefits of biofuels, with studies showing that some biofuels actually generate more greenhouse gases than conventional fuels if one includes the total emissions from agriculture, transport and processing involved in their production.
Furthermore, many are worried that an increase in biofuels production will lead to biodiversity loss and food shortages, especially in developing countries, considering the vast tracts of land that would be required to replace petrol to any significant degree.

Issues: Europe will fail to meet its objective to increase the share of biofuels to 10% of overall transport fuel consumption without a major rise in imports from countries like Brazil, warned EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson at an international conference organised by the Commission on 5 July.
The conference was attended by Brazilian President Lula Da Silva and followed hard on the heels of the first ever EU-Brazil summit, held one day before (EurActiv 5/07/07).
"Europe should be open to accepting that we will import a large part of our biofuel resources," said Mandelson, adding: "We should certainly not contemplate favouring EU production of biofuels with a weak carbon performance if we can import cheaper, cleaner, biofuels. Resource nationalism doesn't serve us particularly well in other areas of energy policy - biofuels are no different."
Currently, biofuel such as ethanol are classified as agricultural goods and enjoy relatively high tariff protection in Europe in order to support the development of the biofuel market and protect European farmers against foreign competition.
However, since there is not enough European land available to produce sufficient amounts of fuel and feed, the EU will have to further open up its doors to imports from third countries, said a number of EU Commissioners speaking at the conference. In the Commission's view, this can be achieved either by means of a multilateral agreement, at the World Trade Organisation, or through bilateral deals, such as the new strategic partnership launched with Brazil on 4 July.
Commission President José Manuel Barroso and Brazilian President Lula Da Silva underlined that further market opening in Europe would also benefit developing countries – currently the main producers of biofuel crops, such as sugar cane and corn.
However, the move could face opposition from some EU members such as France, which are strongly resisting calls from developing countries and the US, to slash EU farm tariffs in order to achieve a deal in global trade talks at the WTO.

Positions: Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson said he was confident that developing countries would eventually gain from expanding their biofuels production: "Many developing countries have spare agricultural capacity and a genuine comparative advantage in production. They also have the climate and land profile that suits energy-rich biofuels," he told the conference.
But he also stressed that the development of such a market "must be tempered by environmental reality."
"Europeans won't pay a premium for biofuels if the ethanol in their car is produced unsustainably by systematically burning fields after harvests or if it comes at the expense of rainforests. We can't allow the switch to biofuels to become an environmentally unsustainable stampede in the developing world."
Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs said: "We could – if we had to – fulfil our 10% target for 2020 entirely through domestically produced biofuels – notably, by using 'set-aside' agricultural land and by reducing the rate at which arable land is being abandoned in the EU. However, even if this approach is technically possible, it is not the one that we want to follow. We think that this purely domestic sourcing of biofuels is neither likely – given current trade rules, and the increased trade liberalisation we hope to see in future – nor desirable."
He concluded: "We need to ensure that our biofuel standards create no unnecessary obstacles."
Commission President José Manuel Barroso said that the new biofuels market "should not only serve the interests of the car-owning rich, but also the interests of the world's poorer nations", adding: "It is true that as the price of staple foods increases, there is a potential impact on food security for the world's poor. But this should be offset by the benefits of improving terms of agricultural trade, which provide developing countries with an opportunity to produce more."
Swedish Minister for Trade Sten Tolgfors commented that Brazilian ethanol was still met with tariffs of up to 55% while the tariff on petrol is as low as 5%. "Why is Europe making ethanol so much more expensive than petrol?" he asked, calling for a full elimination of tariffs on biofuels.
Brazilian President Lula Da Silva pointed out that, in his country, more than six million jobs have been created thanks to the development of a strong biofuels market. Furthermore, he underlined that: "This is not a choice between food and energy," adding that, in Brazil, "the planting of sugar cane did not force out or reduce the production of food." Instead, he said, the increase in sugar cane production has been accompanied by an increase in income. "We can repeat these results in many poor and developing countries" he said.
However, he stressed that, in order for the development of biofuels to become viable for many developing countries, rich countries would first have to put an end to their agricultural subsidies and reduce tariffs. "You must give a chance to those who didn’t have a chance in the 20th century," he concluded amid thunders of applause.
European farm leaders however rejected the idea that the EU should open itself to imports of cheap biofuels on the basis of environmental considerations. "Mandelson must get his facts right on biofuels," said EU farm lobby Copa-Cogeca Secretary General Pekka Pesonen, accusing the Commissioner of closing his eyes to economic realities in developing countries.
"The international cost advantage of, for example, Brazilian production is based firmly on cheap land, won by destruction of rainforests and pristine savannahs, and exploitation of workers even to the point of using slave labour," he stressed, adding: "Mandelson must understand that biofuels policy is also about promoting EU energy independence. No one says that the EU should seal itself from imports. But rejecting out of hand, as Mandelson does, the contribution European farmers can make to meeting the EU’s energy needs in a sustainable way, is something to be expected from a Brazilian minister for exports for example, not the EU’s Trade Commissioner", the Secretary General concluded.
Green NGO Friends of the Earth Europe said that the EU’s commitment to replace 10% of its transport fuel market with biofuels by 2020 was "dangerous" for biodiversity in developing countries and demanded it to be dropped. Citing Indonesia, the world’s largest producer of palm oil – a product used to make biofuels – as an example, Rully Syumanda, Forest Campaigner at Friends of the Earth Indonesia said: "Europe's growing demand for palm oil is leading to environmental and social devastation here in Indonesia."

Latest & next steps:
5-6 July 2007: International Conference on Biofuels
Links EU official documents
Commission (press release): European Commission gathers key international players to discuss sustainable development of biofuels (3 July 2007)
Commission (press release): The European Union deepens energy relations with Brazil (5 July 2007)
Commission (speech): Barroso: Keynote speech on Biofuels - International Biofuels Conference (5 July 2007)
Commission (speech): Mandelson: The biofuel challenge (5 July 2007)
Commission (speech): Piebalgs: Biofuels – the green alternative for transport (5 July 2007)
Commission (speech): Ferrero-Waldner: Opening Speech International Conference on Biofuels (5 July 2007)
EU Actors positions
Copa-Cogeca: Mandelson must get his facts right on biofuels, says COPA-COGECA | FR (5 July 2007)
Friends of the Earth Europe: World's biggest palm oil trader shamed (3 July 2007)
WWF: Contribution to the European Commission Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Biofuels Directive (22 June 2007)
Transnational Institute: Agrofuels - Towards a reality check in nine key areas
Press articles
EurActiv.sk: EÚ zvažuje otvorenie trhu s biopalivami
Associated Press: Biofuels Could Reduce Poverty Gap
Bloomberg: EU Warns Brazil on Environmental Impact of Biofuels
Reuters: EU seeks biofuel imports, environment standards too
Le Monde: Le président brésilien promeut les agrocarburants en Europe
Les Affaires: Le biocarburant pour lutter contre les inégalités
Reuters Germany: Brasilien rückt in Kreis engster EU-Handelspartner auf
AP: Biokraftstoff als Chance für Entwicklungsländer

News
Decrease font size
Increase font size
E-mail to a friend
Systran rough translation
Print this article
RSS
InterActivTools

Del.icio.us
Digg It
Technorati
Letters To The Editor Biofuels = pressure on biodiversity - Willy De Backer, 3E Intelligence
Banning GM food 'a step towards totalitarian state'
more...
Send a Letter To The Editor

Ad('11-3750237-282007&block=1');

Read the One World Column ... mainstreaming ... Peace, Environment, Human Rights, Sustainability, Anti-war voices in the UK Eastern Region www.oneworldcolumn.org

2.

UK plans biofuels and hydrogen power  trains

Posted by: "Andrew Boswell" a_boswell_2004@...   a_boswell_2004

Mon Jul 9, 2007 6:50 am (PST)



Railways set for a hi-tech revolutionhttp://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2121495,00.html

Longer, faster hi-tech trains are planned to end delays and overcrowding

Juliette Jowit, transport editor
Sunday July 8, 2007
The Observer

A 30-year plan to transform rail travel with longer trains that can run closer together using biofuels and even hydrogen power will be set out by the government this month. Ministers are to give more details of a new fleet of inter-city trains, raising the prospect of Britain getting trains similar to the high-speed Velaro recently unveiled in Spain. They will also announce for the first time a 'new generation' train to replace much of Britain's remaining diesel and electric stock. Research will also be unveiled into trams that can run on commuter rail routes and on roads through city centres. Article continues

---------------------------------


---------------------------------

To increase capacity on crowded routes, the white paper is likely to say the latest hi-tech European signalling system will be fitted within a decade so that trains can run closer together. Thousands more carriages are to be ordered so that trains can be made longer. Double-decker trains are thought to be considered too expensive because of the need to increase the height of tunnels and bridges. Other improvements could give passengers general wi-fi access to the internet and provide on-board information about other transport links, while CCTV cameras which can detect suspect packages and 'abnormal behaviour' are being considered, as are anti-viral surfaces to reduce the risk of epidemics such as bird flu spreading. Scanners to detect weapons and explosives could also be installed at major stations. On the tracks, more modern monitoring and repair equipment should allow faults to be detected more quickly and repaired without closing neighbouring lines, creating what
officials call a '24/7 railway' - and raising hopes of ending widespread shutdowns and the misery of replacement bus services at weekends. The improvements will come at a price: officials warn that seats could have to be removed from busy trains so they can carry more standing passengers, and fares could rise further on popular routes to encourage travel outside the rush hour. The white paper is also expected to suggest that savings could be made by further cutting back maintenance on the least used rural lines. Network Rail has asked for nearly £21bn for day-to-day running costs and another £7bn-£8bn for enhancements from 2009 to 2014. However, the white paper is not expected to give a definite go-ahead to three of Britain's biggest rail projects: a new Crossrail route across London, which is the subject of a separate government bill, and new passenger and freight lines from London to Scotland. The wide-ranging plans will be welcomed by passengers and campaigners
who have been complaining about over-crowding and continuing delays caused by infrastructure failures. However, they are likely to be met with caution after previous promises since Labour came to power 10 years ago and previous strategies from Network Rail's predecessor, Railtrack and the government's now disbanded Strategic Rail Authority. There is also likely to be concern about whether the government will put in enough subsidy to pay for the promises and anger if fares continue to rise, particularly before the improvements are introduced. 'People have heard a lot of this before,' said Stephen Joseph, director of the lobby group Transport 2000. 'Because this is coming from government, and the Treasury has had to sign it off, there's a level of commitment that probably wasn't there in the past, but there's still a large level of uncertainty. Passengers will believe this when they see the new trains running down the tracks.' There will also be keen interest in how
far ministers will commit to a new north-south high-speed line. In a draft of the technical strategy, which forms part of the white paper, it is tabled as a possibility between 2020 and 2030. However, rail leaders are hopeful the advice of the government's transport adviser, Rod Eddington, to rule out the new line will not be taken. 'All the hints have been that it's going to be left open,' said Paul Martin, director-general of the Railway Forum industry group. 'I'd be surprised if they slammed the door altogether.' A DfT spokesman said: 'The technical strategy has been produced in close collaboration with the rail industry and brings together many projects already in development. It will inform and guide decisions taken as part of the work on the longer-term strategy, but is separate to it. It will be published in due course.'

Read the One World Column ... mainstreaming ... Peace, Environment, Human Rights, Sustainability, Anti-war voices in the UK Eastern Region www.oneworldcolumn.org

3.

Cellulosic ethanol - 1 of 3 by Stephen Leahy

Posted by: "Andrew Boswell" a_boswell_2004@...   a_boswell_2004

Mon Jul 9, 2007 7:13 am (PST)


http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=10142
Cellulosic ethanol - Clean but worth unproven The big benefit cellulosic ethanol has is that virtually any plant material could be turned into 'green gold', a low-emission fuel for the transportation sector Saturday, June 30, 2007
By Stephen Leahy

Article Tools Print
Email
Discuss


With biofuels being blamed for rising food prices and offering limited environmental benefits, diverse luminaries like former U.S. vice-president Al Gore and Microsoft’s Bill Gates are throwing their considerable support behind cellulosic ethanol, a second generation biofuel.
The big benefit cellulosic ethanol has is that virtually any plant material -- left-over corn stalks, sawdust, wood chips, native perennials grown on marginal lands -- could be turned into 'green gold', a low-emission fuel for the transportation sector.
"Cellulosic ethanol would reduce carbon emissions 88 percent over gasoline," says Bruce Dale, a chemical engineer at the Biomass Conversion Research Laboratory at Michigan State University.
Dale recently published a life cycle analysis comparing various fuels on a carbon emissions per kilometre basis in the prestigious journal Science.
"Any form of ethanol is greatly superior to gasoline in this respect," Dale told IPS.
And he calculates that cellulosic could supply all of the U.S.'s gargantuan appetite – 200+billion U.S. gallons -- for liquid fuel without pushing up food prices because it will use non-food crops grown on marginal lands.
But, he cautions, the cellulosic green-gold revolution will have to proceed carefully to avoid mistakes such as palm oil biodiesel production in south-east Asia that has been labelled as 'deforestation diesel' by environmental activists.
European subsidies for biodiesel prompted an enormous boom in planting palm oil trees in Indonesia and Malaysia in the past few years. Forests were clear-cut and peat swamps drained to plant hundreds of thousands of hectares. Cutting the forests and draining the swamps emitted far more carbon than could ever be saved from using biodiesel, a number of recent analyses show.
"Biofuels for transport is the wrong approach entirely," says Andrew Boswell of Biofuelwatch, a British environmental NGO.
Vast monocultures of oil palm, soya, sugar cane and maize for biofuels results in massive losses of biodiversity and rural livelihoods, serious impacts on water, soil, and food security, Boswell told IPS.
Biofuelwatch and more than 150 civil society organisations have called on the European Union to abandon their targets for biofuel use.
A May 2007 UN Energy report concurred stating that biofuels are more effective when used for heat and power rather than in transport. Boswell does not see cellulosic as much of an improvement as a fuel for transport.
Converting biomass into fuel means less biomass for soil which is crucial to maintaining soil fertility. Growing crops and cellulosic processing plants also require huge amounts of water. There are also biosafety issues since the cellulosic process uses genetically engineered enzymes and genetically engineered crops as feedstocks, he said.
"Investments in energy-efficiency, plug in hybrid cars and more transit would be cheaper and more effective," said Boswell.
"Cellulosic ethanol is just the next big money-maker for the agro-chemical and biotech corporations," he said.
While large companies like Dow Chemical, Monsanto as well as Exxon and Royal Dutch Shell among many others are certainly involved, not a single cellulosic plant has gone into production yet despite 50 years of research.
"It's much more difficult and complex to get ethanol from cellulose," says John Ferrell, co-director of the National Biomass Coordination Office within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
A corn kernel is mostly starch and water, which is easy to breakdown into a sugar and start the fermentation process that produces ethanol, Ferrell said in an interview.
Cellulose is the structural part of a plant -- what holds a plant up -- and it contains much more than starch and water, lignin for example. Genetically engineered bacteria that produce special enzymes can break down some of the materials but not all of it, so there are several steps in the process, longer fermentation times and more energy inputs.
"It's a more costly process, while corn-ethanol production is a proven and profitable technology," says Ferrell.
The world's first and only pre-commercial cellulosic demonstration facility has been in operation for several years in Ottawa, Canada. Funded in large part by the Canadian government and Royal Dutch Shell, the Iogen Energy Corp. facility uses wheat, oat and barley straw to make a 100,000 litres of ethanol a year.
Iogen has been hard at this for close to 25 years and are about to build a full-scale production facility in Iowa, thanks to 80 million dollars from the DOE as part of a special 385 million dollar U.S. government programme to kick-start the nascent industry.
The goal of this largesse is have four to six small but commercial-scale cellulosic plants up and running by 2010, says Ferrell, Iogen among them.
As oil prices stay high, banks and other investors are eager to finance corn ethanol facilities but will steer clear of cellulosic until it proves itself, hence the need for government subsidies, he says.
"It's hard to grasp the current state of the technology because it's in the hands of private companies," says Elizabeth Marshall, an economist at the World Resources Institute who studies the industry.
"There are a lot of smoke and mirrors in the industry with everyone scrambling to get money," Marshall said in an interview.
As a result, companies like Iogen are secretive and decline IPS’ requests for interviews.
And technical challenges remain, she says. The special-enzyme producing bacteria are fussy about what they eat and most operations require a specialised, uniform feedstock such as wheat straw and nothing else.
"However, if it works the energy balance for cellulosic is much better than grain ethanol which uses a lot of energy just to grow crops like corn as feedstocks," Marshall concludes.
Corn prices are at record highs in the U.S. due to the growing demand for ethanol. According to FAO’s latest Food Outlook report, global food import bills are increasing, partly due to soaring demand for biofuels.
Whether celluolosic feedstocks will compete with food crops for land and water depends on how the industry evolves. Marshall is investigating the various implications of a possible future with a major cellulosic industry.
Where and how are the high volumes of biomass going to be grown? How will they be transported and stored? How much biomass can be removed without negative impacts on the soil? How will the industry affect food prices?
A holistic examination of the industry is needed to make sure it brings the promised environmental benefits and minimise the impacts on food prices, she says.
"Protective legislation will be needed to guarantee those benefits and impacts," she adds.
(This article is the first of a three-part series by the author on cellulosic ethanol and the impact of subsidies.)

Source: IPS News


Read the One World Column ... mainstreaming ... Peace, Environment, Human Rights, Sustainability, Anti-war voices in the UK Eastern Region www.oneworldcolumn.org

4.

COLOMBIA:  Civil Resistance Aimed at Recuperating Biodiverse Lands

Posted by: "almuthbernstinguk" almuth@...   almuthbernstinguk

Mon Jul 9, 2007 4:46 pm (PST)

http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=38290

By Zilia Castrillón

CHOCÓ, Colombia, Jun 23 (IPS/IFEJ) - Indigenous and black communities
of Colombia's north-western department of Chocó are trying to recover
their lands and food sources, lost to the decades-long civil war that
has taken its toll on this area of vast biological diversity.

Alirio Mosquera, legal representative of the community councils that
unite the 3,000 inhabitants of the Cacarica River basin on the Bajo
Atrato (lower Atrato River), is working to combine community
production projects with the peaceful resistance to the Colombian
internal conflict that has lasted a half-century.

"The people need their land returned in order to recover their
traditional practices," Mosquera said in an interview.

He was elected May 20 after a long struggle as logistical coordinator
for the return of more than 700 families displaced in 1997 by violence
by the army and right-wing paramilitary groups, which ended in land
being seized or illegally purchased by agribusiness and forestry
companies.

Known as "Operation Genesis", it left more than 4,000 people displaced
and at least 85 people dead or disappeared, according to the National
Movement of Victims of State Crimes.

"All the community councils are allies of the proposals of our
organisation CAVIDA (Communities of Self-Determination, Life and
Dignity of the Cacarica) because we have always defended the right to
land," says Mosquera.

"The land is the core of our life. When one loses it, gives it up, one
is left as a dayworker or as a slave," he adds.

In this humid, forested zone, surrounded by marshes and swamps, live
blacks and indigenous peoples, with constitutional rights to
collective lands and to overseeing their management.

Afro-Colombians constitute 85 percent of the Chocó population.

Cacarica is part of the Special Management Area of the Darién
Mountains, which separate Colombia from Panama. It is located in the
buffer zone of Los Katíos National Nature Park, home to numerous
endemic species and whose land is rich in minerals.

The violent displacement and illegal occupation of lands were
denounced in the biodiversity hearing held by the non-governmental
Permanent People's Tribunal, Colombia Chapter, on Feb. 26-27.

The tribunal held sessions in humanitarian zones established beginning
in 1999 -- when the displaced peoples decided to return to their
territory of 103,000 hectares -- where the families live and try to
protect themselves from armed attacks.

Among the conclusions of the hearings, the active participation of
paramilitaries in the negotiations and the concession of
non-collective lands to returnees were mentioned.

For the members of the community councils of the Cacarica, Jiguamiandó
and Curvaradó river basins, food self-sufficiency and land recovery
are a form of civil resistance.

"We won't allow people with weapons or multinational companies in our
territory. We aren't neutral because we are victims of the conflict,"
Bernardo Vivas, founding member of CAVIDA and of the humanitarian
zones, said in one of the meetings with international organisations
that took part in the Tribunal session.

In addition to the food shortage, the granting of land for large-scale
cultivation of monoculture crops like banana and African palm is
complicating CAVIDA's goals.

Agriculture Minister Andrés Felipe Arias recognised in an Executive
branch session on the Colombian Pacific, held in Cali on Jun. 3, that
there are 17,000 hectares with titles in the Urabá area of Chocó
department (of which Cacarica is a part) that pose problems, "given
that they are lands claimed by individuals as private."

Arias acknowledged that there was corruption in the purchase of those
lands, and that it was denounced at the time by the inhabitants.

According to the community members, the government has failed to take
action towards recuperating the seized lands, which they estimate to
be 22,000 hectares -- about 25 percent of the collective territory.

A report by the government's Institute of Rural Development from March
2005 said that "a group of investors associated with the companies
Urapalma, Palmas de Curvaradó, Pamadó, Palmas SA, Palmura, Asibicon,
La Tukeka, Selva Húmeda and Inversiones Fregni Ochoa carried out a
massive buying and selling of lands of different persons" and behind
the back of the community, "with the purpose of establishing
commercial fields of palm oil and extensive livestock projects."

The study also underscored that in the Curvaradó and Jiguamiandó river
basins there were 3,834 hectares planted with palm oil, destined for
production of biodiesel.

"The negotiations with the business executives did not occur with
equal rights. And they were illegal, because our territory is
inalienable and non-embargable," says Marcos Velásquez, of Nuevo
Espacio, one of the humanitarian zones.

The communities hope that, through the partial demobilisation of
paramilitaries promoted by the government, their lands will be
returned to them as part of the reparations as victims of the illegal
armed groups.

But it won't be that easy -- the commercially farmed lands are already
in progress.

In a statement issued Jun. 7, the Inter-Ecclesial Commission of
Justice and Peace denounced the CI Multifruit company for continuing
to expand banana cultivation for export, through the U.S. firm Del Monte.

The local population subsists on their own maize and rice, travelling
from the communal humanitarian zones to the plots that belonged to
them before they were displaced, and returning at the end of the day,
sometimes facing military harassment.

In the CAVIDA community zones they are trying out production of
medicinal plants and fruits, but they still lack the capacity to grow
crops that assure them a decent livelihood.

"They cut a lot of wood here, although it's small scale," says
Mosquera, worried about the forests, source of sustenance for the
local inhabitants.

As the legal representative and leader of the river basin's residents,
he hopes to develop crops of manioc and maize, among others, and to
set up a woodworking project that would use wood from the sustainable
management of local lumber.

(*This story is part of a series of features on sustainable
development by IPS - Inter Press Service, and IFEJ - the International
Federation of Environmental Journalists.)

(END/2007)

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
Yahoo! Mail

Next gen email?

Try the all-new

Yahoo! Mail Beta.

Search Ads

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Yahoo! Groups

Moderator Central

get help and provide

feedback on Groups.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web


Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:19 am

biofuelwatch@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
Forward
Message #422 of 892 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Item 4 here on Columbia. Items 1-3 on the huge & dangerous boost being given to biofuels in Europe and US, without comrehension of the effects in developing ...
Felix Padel
felixorisa
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2007
8:18 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help