Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 2:50 PM

Dear friends of Astronomy, Science Maths and philosophy,

Many a times science has discussion of the theoretical parts of
science which is difficult to put in concrete proofs : but
Mathematics' SAC theory does have some explanations.

LET US see first a process of simple chemical process :- OXIDATION &
REDUCTION and using a SAC theory for the process.
1) in simple primary understanding OXIDATION / REDUCTION are process
of some thing combining with OXYGEN or a reverse the process. where
a chemical element O is required. Bur is that all? NO let us go step
further in atomic level exchanges.

A) as O has a -ve charge : and combines with a Positively charged
elemental ion - similar process happens every where in chemistry and
Biochemical processes. SO OXIDATION & REDUCTION can be explained as
process of the combination of +ve & -ve elementary ions, where
OXYGEN is not there!!!

B) going further in sub atomic reactions :- During all the chemical
process of above atomic level reactions there are exchange of -ve
charged sub atomic particles. -ve charged ELECTRONs so it means
OXIDATION & REDUCTION can further be explained as Exchange of the -
ve (electrons)/+ve (protons) electronic charge during the process.

C) further break down of the subatomic particles OXIDATION &
REDUCTION does not need a exchange of -ve (electrons)/+ve
(protons) - any -ve (charged sub particle)/+ve (charged sub
particle) can full fill the process at that sub atomic level.

These theories were based on the basic mathematical SAC theory
solutions of the chemical process of the chemical reactions of the
OXIDATION & REDUCTION. AS actual presence of the element is not
necessary for the reaction eg OXIDATION without Oxygen O2. and all
process of chemical reaction and biochemical Metabolism process may
fall under the sub OXIDATION & REDUCTION process.

Going BACK to the subject of Space
1) SAC - SPACE is main SAC - includes Earth SAC as a sub SAC and all
matter in the space, star, dust and all.
2) SAC Earth is SUB SAC to Space SAC - which includes the Earth
materials - ITS ENERGY, LIFE on the Earth and its ENVIRONMENT and
all we SEE/FEEL on the EARTH.




As in Chemical process of the OXIDATION & REDUCTION we seen level of
Exchanges of atomic and sub atomic exchange. here it may be a
physical exchange of the matter of any form of the Energy from the
main SAC SPACE and sub SAC EARTH or a visa versa.


Example 1) if a rocket fly from SUB SAC EARTH to the Main SAC of the
SPACE - the SAC theory says a PART of the SAC Space is occupied by
the rocket from the Sub SAC EARTH. so Earth has used a part of Main
SAC SPACE. - so Earth is utilising a space. and part of the SPACE is
dragged with the EARTH if Rocket remains in the SPACE.

Going to next step deeper the process can be similar if an
antimatter from the main SAC SPACE arrives to EARTH SAC instead of
MATTER (Rocket) going away from the Earth.

OR say any form of Energy is driven out of the SAC EARTH to main SAC
SPACE - eg Heat loss of the Earth interior to the space or sound
generated by the Earth to the space. Earth vibration - EARTH SONG!!
if the Earth vibration are created by the Earth then that part of
the Vibration energy is going to space using the space than space is
used by the Earth - so earth is taking Space with it while it travel
in the space.

Atmosphere loss in the SPACE by the Earth, or even further WE HAVE
some thing more than PANCH MAHABHOOT with us. AaTMA - LIFE part of
the EARTHen life. that is not a part of PANCH MAHABHOOT and so on
the dissolutions of PANCH MAHABHOOT, AaTMA does not stay in the
Earth. should it be in the SPACE or utilise the MAIN SAC SPACE while
going from the Earthen LIFE? Does that use SPACE and SPACE is
dragged with the EARTH with loss of AaTMA from the EARTHen LIFE?

Previous mail : -

1) As we had some discussion of vibration created in the space by
the Earth and its movements. - what type of waves might those be?
how those travel in the space? does it need a medium to travel in
the space - a theoretical medium? what tune - frequency does it
have? is it one of the tune of we know of (sa, re, ga, ma, pa, dha,
ni, sha?) or a different one? now that has become a subject of
Science philosophy.

2) Now a day science is getting a step closer to the more
complicated philosophical subject - "a space dragged by Earth while
travel through the space" !!! But how could that happen? how a space
(Vacuum) - non mass can be dragged behind the Earth. does the space
has a MASS? & Gravitation to follow the rules of Newtonian?

Veda has given some guidelines as every thing are made from only
from PANCH MAHABHOOT (five parts) even our body. It may be very
difficult to understand for who do not have basics of VEDAs but
there are other ways to give mathematical explanations for those.

A) Earth - Earthy elements - Biochemistry of the body and elements
of the Earth & naturally all body elements are from the Earth only
and non Earthy elements can not be there.
B) JAL - Water - fluid - main component of the body.
C) VAYU - GAS - all gaseous composition of the Boby generated in
body and also in Living respiration and decomposition process.
D) AGNI - FIRE - a process of Burning - respiration - digestion -
metabolism and all METABOLIC?ANABOLIC PROCESS OF THE LIFE and even
cellular death - cellular decomposition process after the clinical
death.
E - 5 ) A AVKAaSh - AaKAaSH - VACUUM - How that can happen a space
in side the body? BODY does not have a SPACE Vacuum in any of
ANATOMICAL and PHYSIOLOGICAL explanations !!

So what is the fact? Is the Medical science of ANATOMY/PHYSIOLOGY
is correct or the PHILOSOPHY of the Vedic BODY SCIENCE? and why
today's Science is after the theoretical explanations of SPACE
DRAGGED BY THE EARTH and EARTH SONG theory of vibration by the Earth
in the space?

ALL this is just difficult of as there are no scientific way to
prove those by the science. but wait for a while there is another
way for theoretical explanations by mathematical theoretical
explanation to show that that can be that. - IF so then Is the VEDIC
philosophical body science is correct? was Rajnishjee was correct
what he said 30 years ago when science was in dark?

LET US SEE in the next coming answers of the Mathematical
explanatory theoretical proof - soon after this - Just wait for this.

From Yours : Dr. BHUDIA.- Science Group Of INDIA.

President:"Kutch Science Foundation".
Founder :"Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club - Bhuj - Kutch".
Life Member:"kutch Itihaas Parishad".

kutchscience@..., kutchscience@...,

Just click on web page: http://uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/

http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/venustransit_2004/



http://www.geocities.com/kutchscience
http://profiles.yahoo.com/kutchscience2000
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/scienceclubofindia
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kutchscience
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kachchh

http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/bhuj