Sign In
New User? Register
scienceclubofindia · SCIENCE club of INDIA - For Development of Sciences in India By Dr. Bhudia
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Just waiting to hear for the Hominid Fossils found in the KUTCH!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #498 of 600 |

From: kutchsciencefoundation@... Dear EDITORIALS, Friends of the
Science, History, paleontology and Geology, If oyu are just waiting to hear for
the Hominid Fossils found in the KUTCH, your wish will be copleted very soon in
near future! teams are working to get the perfect evidence proofs and soon reach
to conclusion to clear the confusions.Do not be surprised if you get a good vews
of unexpected HOMINID fossil find in the KUTCH of GUJARAT INDIA. Though most of
the geologist stick to the darwinian beliefs, But thats not the coplete truth
and thats the reality that darwinian theory is not the coplete science of
creation of the GOD.Many of the geologist are in favour of the New Study
Supporting the Idea That Primates and Dinosaurs Coexisted. and Many geologists
do stay away from those Geologist but must not afraid of these but dare to read
their finding facts too. GEOLOGIST opposing those viws must read the BOOK about
the hominid evolution, the canals studied of many living primates, "Review of
Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race."
Books and Documentry Filming evedenses are avilable for reference ONLy at out
Science library geology sections.
15) Archaeological library WITH ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ARCHEOLOGY , Forbidden
archaeology including Civilisation and DHOLAVIRA video library, INCA, MAYA,
EGYPT, INDUS etc.
16) Geological Science Library including fossils and DINO fossils complete sets
of Photographic libraries INCLUDING Forbidden Geology, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GEOLOGY.
including video library INCLUDING Forbidden Geology video.

Many doubts were raised when ETV and Bombay SAMACHAR broadcasted the following
news, with doubt that the PURVA - Aadi MANAV ancestor was not existing at that
time but now the skeleton evidence came out that the ancestor missing link was
there at that time before (about 22 to 5.5 million years ago) between 11 and 16
million years ago.
The partial skeleton of this 13-million-year-old 'missing link' was found by
palaeontologists working at a dig site near Barcelona in Spain.
That time matches with the Rameshwarm bridge and RAMAVATAR and Koteshwar -
RAVANa History (Tretauga), means Formation of MONKEY and Apes army formation by
DEVAs. that will rule out all the doubts raised for the PURVA - Aadi MANAV.
Hominid Foot prints found in older layers may have been formed later in the
geological process but the study of Photomicrographs and infrared photography is
required so that to eliminate that there were no signs of carving or artificial
markings in or around the prints. A study of microscopic count of sand grains is
ralso required so indicating that the material within the prints had been
impacted, and created as the result of a force pressing down on the firmament
while it was soft. These facts show that the prints were made by the natural
result of pressure from the human foot, and in no way could have been duplicated
by carving nor only the pheneonmena of honeycomb appearance as the study of
Photomicrographs and infrared photography can differnciate the compact sand
particles under the pressurepoints which are not in honeycomb pattern
appearance.
Many geologists and paleontologists do visit with curiocity of the specimen and
the subject but have no background of study of Photomicrographs and infrared
photography and its geological/paleontological applications so do not have any
clue or chance to study those subjects in that angle of research. unfortunately
lack of resourses and facility for such a research.

Below:- POP of Hominid Footprint and Measuring the Fossil of Hominid Footprint


Phase Two Fossils: Burroughs Conjecture
The most cogent explanation of anomalous fossil footprints is perhaps offered by
Dr. William Greely Burroughs, of Berea College in Kentucky. Dr. Burroughs
conjecture is that a depression in fossil-bearing rock may, long after the
original fossils have been formed, be filled with a sediment that in its turn
may also become the medium in which the impression of a footprint or the body of
a creature is fossilized. When this second period of fossilization is complete
the newly formed rock may be indistinguishable from the older formation, and the
new fossils may appear to have formed at the same time as those which are much
older. Thus, several fossilization processes may wind up looking like a
footprint made at the same time. This is undoubtebly the case in many instances,
but the theory is lacking in several respects. Firstly, fossilized human
footprints have been found deep within rocks that show no evidence of
discontinuous formation, not just at the junction of sedimentary layers.
Secondly, out of place fossils are often inconsistent not only with the ages of
associated fossils but also with the rock strata and the age conventionally
ascribed to them. New Study Supports Idea That Primates, Dinosaurs Coexisted
!!!!

Sientists have acquired new data supporting the idea that the last ancestor
shared by all living primates walked with the dinosaurs more than 80 million
years ago. The results came from a new technique used to reconstruct the course
of animal evolution.Previously, opposing scientific camps estimated that the
animal that gave rise to the primates lived as recently as 55 million years ago
and as long ago as 90 million years. The newly proposed date is closer to the
older end of the range. That's significant because the older estimate, which was
derived from studies based on molecular genetics, identifies the earliest
primates as contemporaries of the dinosaurs. The younger date, which was based
on fossil records, represents a period after the dinosaurs had already become
extinct. 'Our results agree broadly with a molecular estimate [and] contradict
widely accepted palaeontological estimates,' Simon Tavaré of the University of
Southern California and his colleagues reported in the journal Nature.
Their finding sprang from a scientific collaboration that straddled the fields
of biology and mathematics and spanned research centers from California to the
Swiss Alps.
Working with colleagues from Harvard University, the University of Washington,
Chicago's Field Museum, and institutions in England and Switzerland, Tavaré used
a novel mathematical approach to help answer a major piece of the evolutionary
puzzle.
Past Views
The search for the first primate—that is, the last animal to have been an
ancestor of all members of the primate family tree—has long intrigued scientists
and others interested in humanity's evolutionary origins.
From the oldest known fossil remains of primates, paleontologists have
determined that some ancient members of our evolutionary family lived and died
at least as far back as 55 million years ago.
Fossils alone, however, cannot disclose precisely when members of the last
common ancestral species began to segregate into distinct populations that
eventually gave rise to the modern array of some 200 primate species.
That's because the fossil record is incomplete. Paleontologists can't tell how
close any particular specimen was to the progenitor of the primates.
So, to approach the problem from another angle, scientists in the field of
molecular genetics have compared subtle differences in the DNA of living
primates. Geneticists can tell how recently two species diverged from a common
ancestor from information etched in the organisms' genes: The fewer differences
researchers find between two genetic codes, the more recently the species parted
evolutionary company. Using this method, geneticists have concluded that about
90 million years have elapsed since all living primates shared their last common
ancestor. Based on such studies, evolutionary biologists such as Pennsylvania
State University's Blair Hedges believe that early primates lived alongside the
great reptiles.
'[Primates and other] major groups of mammals evolved for tens of millions of
years before the dinosaurs became extinct,' Hedges said. That mass extinction
occurred about 65 million years ago.
Fleshing out the Fossil Record
To reconcile the genetics-based date with the comparatively young estimates of
paleontologists, Tavaré and his colleagues fashioned an evolutionary tree of the
primates as it's known from fossils.
Not wanting to depend entirely on what paleontologists have turned up, the
researchers then fleshed out the rudimentary tree with educated guesswork. They
used mathematical equations to predict how many species of primates are not
represented in the fossil record, and to predict when and for how long those
species may have lived.
The resulting model—based loosely on hard evidence but expanded to take into
account species that lived and died out but remain unknown to science—suggests
that the earliest primate lived about 81.5 million years ago, long before the
age of the oldest fossils uncovered by paleontologists.
'Naturally,' said Hedges, 'I am pleased with this result because it shows
agreement with our molecular-clock studies.'
Tavaré's team suggested that the earliest primates might have been small,
nocturnal creatures that inhabited tropical forests. But, assuming they did
exist that long ago, numerous forms could have evolved prior to the fateful
cataclysm that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.
That event, presumably caused by a giant impact from outerspace, didn't wipe out
all primates living at the time, but probably spared relatively few of them,
Tavaré theorized. Those primates that survived would have subsequently evolved
into myriad species.
'Of course, this is all speculation,' Tavaré acknowledged. 'We have not found
any fossils in that bin yet.'
In fact, scientists may never know how these proposed lost kin of ours looked—or
be certain they existed at all—unless paleontologists someday recover fossilized
remains. FROM YOURS Dr.BHUDIA-Science Group Of
INDIA.http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/venustransit_2004/President:'Kutch
Science Foundation'.Founder :'Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club - Bhuj -
Kutch'.Life Member:'kutch Itihaas Parishad'.kutchscience@...,
kutchscience@...,http://uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/
http://www.geocities.com/kutchsciencehttp://profiles.yahoo.com/kutchscience2000h\
ttp://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/scienceclubofindiahttp://in.groups.yahoo.com/gro\
up/kutchsciencehttp://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kachchhhttp://in.groups.yahoo.co\
m/group/bhuj

_________________________________________________________________
Make a mini you and download it into Windows Live Messenger
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Tue Sep 2, 2008 1:05 pm

sciencegroup...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #498 of 600 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

From: kutchsciencefoundation@... Dear EDITORIALS, Friends of the Science, History, paleontology and Geology, If oyu are just waiting to hear for the...
Dr Bhudia Kutch Scien...
sciencegroup...
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
1:05 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help