On Thu, 24/9/09, r_v_karanth@... wrote to Dr.Bhudia:

You may be right. I had
also given the explanation that tectonic activity could be a reason. However,
there appears to be some human intervention. The tectonic fractures are somewhat
oblique to these channels. Could this be a sort of sign to attract the attention
from a distance? The ancient constructions above this hill are now destroyed.
One arm of this structure (middle one) is also destroyed for taking out stone
blocks.
-RV Karanth

Thu, 24/9/09, Dr Bhudia Kutch Science Foundation
kutchsciencefoundation@...
wrote:

From: Dr Bhudia Kutch Science Foundation
<kutchsciencefoundation@...>
Subject: RE: Lat-Long of "VI"
hill
To: "MS GADHVI" msgadhvi@...,
"Viswanatha Karanth" r_v_karanth@...,
"drbhudia@..." drbhudia@...
Date:
Thursday, 24 September, 2009, 4:53 PM












KHAVDA VI @ Paccham Raimalro
Hill


Dear Dr karanth saab, and MS GADHAVI

Thank you for forwarding the Long Lati of
"V I" Sign at the Place Raimalro Hill@ Khavda
some
calculative measurements and interpretation is attache, please correct if any
errors.
Yours dr Bhudia


Do visit
our ABOVE Clubs/Groups of Science Groups of India.


"V I" Sign seen @ 23.857380 N 69.757579
E on the Paccham Raimalro
Hill near khavda 3km as
shown on the map. The sign Geo-trigonometric
interpretation measured by satellite readings is as follows.

All lines in the Sign has
direction away from the North Pole and line AB 780' makes angle of about 30NE,
where angle B is about 45 and line DE is not parallel to any other
lines.
Measurement line AB = 780
feet, line BC is 750 feet and AC is 600 feet apart, line DE is 730
feet
Height A=335feet, B &
E=215 feet, C=350 feet and D = 337feet from sea level

Height difference B to A
is 335-215=120 height of the hill at distance 780 feet of B to A.
This makes inclination of
height of the hill at B to A = sign È = 120/780
=0.15 where anti sign shows angle of 8.9 ONLY


But we can not
ignore a "Nenu Ni DHAR" civilisation near Khavada 1.5km @ 23.51N -
69.44E.

Which make no relations to
angle of Earth axis nor to direction to pole or pole star in the sky. Which
makes me to think that it has not any geometric or astronomical relations but
may be some tectonic marks of previous tectonic activity at the place?


Dr.BHUDIA-Science Group Of
INDIA.
uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/venustransit_2004/
President:'Kutch
Science Foundation'.
Founder :'Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club - Bhuj -
Kutch'.
Life Member:'kutch Itihaas Parishad'.
kutchscience@...,
kutchscience@...,
uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/
in.groups.yahoo.com/group/scienceclubofindia
in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kutchscience
in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kachchh
in.groups.yahoo.com/group/bhuj


Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009
10:39:29 +0000
To: kutchsciencefoundation@...
Subject: Re:
Lat-Long of "VI" hill
From: msgadhvi@...
CC:
r_v_karanth@...

Dear Sir,
Best wishes for your USA visit.

Presently I have to work hard L. D. Engg. College to prepare lecture notes
and PowerPoint presentations. Rest is fine.
The VI hill is located at
Lat:
23.857380 N
Long: 69.757579 E
Regards,
Mahendra

Dear Dr.
Bhudia,
Thanks for your mail and for sending scanned copy of toposheet of
Khavda area. I can observe that the VI hill is named as Raimalro Hill on the
toposheet you have attached with your mail and is located 3 km away from Khavda
in NE direction.

Regards,
M. S. Gadhavi


Dear Dr. Bhudia,
Here is the lat-long of the hill sent by MSG:
The VI hill is located at
Lat: 23.857380 N
Long: 69.757579 E-RV
Karanth


_________________________________________________________________
With Windows Live, you can organise, edit, and share your photos.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]