From stelacota@... Thu Jun 18 07:37:09 2009
Return-Path: <stelacota@...>
Received: (qmail 39109 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 14:37:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (98.137.34.44)
by m5.grp.re1.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Jun 2009 14:37:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n43d.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.157)
by mta1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 14:37:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.co.in; s=foxtrot; t=1245335789; bh=/QGqXNrVMMShH08JoLvCxnWyy8ze006SAzcbWeVL2Oc=; h=Received:Received:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:MIME-Version:X-Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:Subject:X-Yahoo-Group-Post:X-Yahoo-Profile:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-YGroups-SubInfo:X-eGroups-Edited-By:Sender:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-eGroups-Approved-By:X-eGroups-Auth; b=b0ybXd3VNQx1UxeGSRBi1YwqpmZg4YbR9CJh6bebUvPKp4I4hEMMIPYuqJD+Vc5122sLoaXvRpWkkjZOSHTO3t2loziIYepk2WzKgPKC2rsr1zegL3UEJyBEpq7nZd/Y
Received: from [69.147.65.147] by n43.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jun 2009 14:36:29 -0000
Received: from [98.137.34.34] by t10.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jun 2009 14:36:29 -0000
X-Sender: stelacota@...
X-Apparently-To: visual-modflow@...
X-Received: (qmail 455 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 13:47:21 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (69.147.108.201)
by m3.grp.re1.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Jun 2009 13:47:21 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mail-fx0-f207.google.com) (209.85.220.207)
by mta2.grp.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 13:47:21 -0000
X-Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so1004440fxm.20
for <visual-modflow@...>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.216.20.74 with SMTP id o52mr415964weo.147.1245332780412; Thu,
18 Jun 2009 06:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <h1ao9v+alti@eGroups.com>
References: <h1ao9v+alti@eGroups.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:46:20 -0300
Message-ID: <e247f5630906180646pef5b3a1o97da3ed01a2eb709@...>
To: visual-modflow@...
X-Originating-IP: 209.85.220.207
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
From: Stela Cota <stelacota@...>
Subject: Re: [visual-modflow] Model Boundary
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=343984961; y=JGDGTAVWyb_CjjvZNia58RMJCSifo4J6gz4Irn2cMpw7nSdH
X-Yahoo-Profile: stelacota
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-YGroups-SubInfo: t=0;f=16;g=none;
X-eGroups-Edited-By: cpkumar <cpkumar@...>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-system
X-eGroups-Approved-By: cpkumar <cpkumar@...> via web; 18 Jun 2009 14:36:29 -0000
Jason,
I would say that it depends on your objective. If you just want to describe
a steady-state well-defined flow system, you can do as you said, no problem.
Just remember that the flow model that you created using constant head
is absolutely rigid. This kind of model may not work well if you need to
verify the model response for stresses, mainly if the stress (a well, for
instance) is located close to the boundary condition.
>
>
> I want to develop a simple 1 layer model and was wondering if I could use
> constant head boundaries on the upgradient and downgradient sides ends of my
> model area that match groundwater elevations measured in wells in both
> areas. Would this work or do I need to apply recharge values to simulate
> groundwater recharge. Your help would be appreciated.
>
> -Jason
I want to develop a simple 1 layer model and was wondering if I could use constant head boundaries on the upgradient and downgradient sides ends of my model...
Jason, I would say that it depends on your objective. If you just want to describe a steady-state well-defined flow system, you can do as you said, no problem....
Offline 
Send Email